Enduring Power of Attorney and Enduring Power of Guardianship

January 5, 2026

Author name

There are two types of powers of attorney, a power of attorney (also known as a POA) and an enduring power of attorney (also known as an EPA).

Previously we covered an overview of what a Will in Western Australia is, what the requirements are for a Will to be considered valid, and what are some of the consequences that come from passing away without a Will.


We will now cover some of the other documents that can be prepared when undertaking your estate planning.


Let’s have a look:


Enduring Power of Attorney


There are two types of powers of attorney, a power of attorney (also known as a POA) and an enduring power of attorney (also known as an EPA). The key difference between a POA and an EPA is that an EPA will continue to operate even if the person who made the document loses full legal capacity, unlike a POA where it will cease to be valid. For the purpose of this article we are going to focus on the EPA as this is more commonly used in estate planning environments.


An EPA is a legal document whereby the donor (person making the EPA) gives another person and/or organisation (the attorney) the authority to make legal, financial and property decisions on the donor’s behalf. It is largely used whenever an individual loses the ability to make independent decisions on account of an illness, injury or similar circumstance, and can be made by anyone over the age of 18 who has full legal capacity.


When making an EPA, you can appoint a primary attorney as well as substitute attorney. You can also make the attorney’s powers general or impose restrictions on the decisions that can be made on your behalf.


An EPA can come into effect either immediately upon the EPA being signed and witnessed, or only once the State Administrative Tribunal has made a declaration that the donor has lost legal capacity.


If the donor has property, it is important to note that the EPA must be lodged with Landgate in order for the attorney to be able to deal with the donor’s property. Ideally this should be undertaken within 3 months of the EPA being signed by the donor, otherwise Landgate will require additional documents to be lodged together with the EPA to affirm its validity.


Enduring Power of Guardianship


Another legal document to be considered is the enduring power of guardianship (also known as an EPG).

                                               

An EPG is a legal document whereby the donor (person making the EPG) gives another person (the guardian) the authority to make personal, lifestyle and treatment decisions on the donor’s behalf. To make an EPG, the donor again must be 18 years of age or older and have full legal capacity.


When making an EPG, you can appoint a primary guardian as well as substitute guardian. You can also make the guardian’s powers general or impose restrictions on the decisions that can be made on your behalf.


Unlike an EPA, an EPG will only become effective after a person has been declared legally unable to make their own decisions and is not required to be registered with Landgate or any other third party. An EPG.


Conclusion


Life is unpredictable so it’s recommended to make use of the instruments available to you to protect your rights and interests not only when you pass, but also whilst you are alive but are not able to make your own decisions.


This is what these documents seek to achieve, largely through using the trust-based relationships already present in your life, which means that whoever you name in these documents should be very well picked.


There are a number of formalities that need to be addressed when undertaking these documents so it is recommended you engage professional advice in order to ensure your rights and interests are adequately addressed. You can always count on the guidance and advice from Bailiwick Legal in this space, so feel free to contact us through this link should you have any queries. 


The contents of this article does not constitute legal advice, is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. It is designed and intended to provide general information in summary form on legal topics, current at the time of publication, for general informational purposes only. The material may not apply to all jurisdictions. You should seek legal advice or other professional advice in relation to any particular matters you may have.


By Danielle Edwards (Senior Associate)

Aerial image of Rawlinna Station
January 5, 2026
Bailiwick Legal is proud to have acted for Consolidated Pastoral Company (CPC) in its successful acquisition of Rawlinna Station , Australia’s largest sheep station, located on the remote Nullarbor Plain in Western Australia. Spanning over 1 million hectares and running approximately 30,000 sheep , Rawlinna is an iconic pastoral asset with a rich legacy, having been held by the MacLachlan family’s Jumbuck Pastoral Company since its establishment in 1962. The sale marks the first change of ownership in over six decades and was finalised following formal approval from the Western Australian Government for the transfer of the pastoral leases. This transaction involved navigating: The transfer of three separate pastoral leases Coordination across multiple vendor entities Consideration of livestock and operating assets Fulfilment of regulatory and compliance requirements, including WA lease approval processes Bailiwick Legal is a boutique agricultural and regional law firm , proudly based in Perth and Bridgetown, Western Australia. Our role in this acquisition demonstrates that deep sector knowledge, local insight, and personalised legal support are crucial for agribusiness clients managing complex, high-value transactions. Our team, led by our regionally-based solicitor, Matilda Lloyd, provided end-to-end legal and strategic support, including: Due diligence on land tenure and operating assets Contract negotiation and preparation Advice on regulatory approvals and compliance Strategic coordination with CPC’s internal and external stakeholders to ensure a smooth and timely settlement We are honoured to have supported CPC in this milestone acquisition and look forward to watching Rawlinna’s next chapter unfolds. At Bailiwick Legal, we believe that regional expertise, deep industry knowledge, and relationship-based service remain essential to agribusiness success, no matter the scale. Congratulations to all parties involved, including the MacLachlan family, whose stewardship of Rawlinna leaves a lasting legacy in Australian agriculture. – The Bailiwick Legal Team Working alongside agribusinesses to grow, transition, and thrive . For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au By Matilda Lloyd (Associate) For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
By Jessica Brunner June 19, 2024
Our June 2024 newsletter is now available. Have a read to find out what we have been up to in the first half of the year!
May 14, 2024
The International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC) System has come to the attention of many Western Australian farmers recently, as the scheme has changed one of its policies regarding aerial spraying. What is the ISCC? The ISCC is one of the world’s largest voluntary sustainability certification schemes enabling participants to demonstrate they are producing materials in a sustainable way that meets or exceeds community expectations. In Australia it is widely used in the canola industry, enabling Australian canola growers to access the European biofuel market. CBH Marketing and Trading holds certification for the ISCC EU and ISCC PLUS programs, that cover canola, barley, oats, wheat and lupin, allowing WA growers to participate in both programs. Participating in the ISCC program can result in a premium on grain, however participants are subject to more stringent measures to satisfy sustainability accreditation requirements. Recent decision on aerial spraying ISCC Principle 2.6.2 prevents aerial spraying from taking place within 500 metres of a body of water. CBH has successfully lobbied for an exemption to this Principle, for farm dams and salt lakes of low ecological value. As part of its lobbying, CBH provided expert reports to the ISCC on the hydrology and ecology of WA farm systems. For farmers who are signed up to the ISCC program, this removes an obstacle during the season for weed management. The Principle does still require a 500 metre buffer for other bodies of water, including freshwater lakes, rivers, ponds or creeks. However, for those who farm yabbies and marron, this change may not be welcome. Marron and yabby farmers have noticed impacts on their populations where aerial spraying has taken place close to their properties, and aerial spraying can unintentionally damage natural vegetation, including young and old growth trees. For growers, it’s always prudent to follow best practice guidelines for aerial spraying to avoid spray drift – including monitoring weather conditions and the effect of water added to the chemical. For some farmers, this decision may prompt an examination of whether signing up to the ISCC program might be best for their business. In this circumstance, it is important to weigh up the potential benefits of the program compared to the sustainability accreditation requirements. For others, this decision is a timely reminder to stay up to date with best practice guidelines when it comes to spraying, particularly during the seeding season. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au By Ciara Nalty (Solicitor) For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.